The government of Bangladesh has released stimulus packages worth around BDT 1 lakh crore, which is 3.3% of the GDP, to rescue the economy from the crisis arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.
According to the Prime Minister, the objective of the stimulus is to alleviate the tribulations triggered by the pandemic and also maintain economic growth for the next 3 years.[1]
The announced packages have raised both excitement and skepticism among experts.[2] Pre-pandemic, the country was already facing economic downturns – decreased government earnings, falling export revenue, liquidity crisis of the banking sector, rising government loans, and a bearish capital market.[3]
Thus, it is necessary to see whether Bangladesh can pay off the costly stimulus package payments once the crisis is over.
Stimulus packages have often raised eyebrows among critics. They argue nations will not be able to pay them off and will default. However, this argument has not always been true and indeed countries have often succeeded in paying off the payments.[4]
Available data from the Finance Division shows Bangladesh has been in a budget deficit since FY 1990-1991. This means the government will need financing to pay off the budget deficit.
With the current budget deficit-to-GDP ratio still in the acceptable range of 5%, financing from both domestic and foreign sources might be a viable option.
However, the government had used up 99.5% of its borrowing target from the banking sector by December 2019 and simultaneously increased foreign borrowing.[5] Adding the payment for stimulus packages will mean the government will need to allocate more to repaying loans and interests in the budget for the coming years than to development projects.
In addition, if the government relies on the banking sector for deficit financing, the sector will have less credit for private investments.
The role of the banking sector in the stimulus packages is also a matter of concern. Most of the stimulus packages involve repayable loans whose funds must be generated by commercial banks. The banking sector’s ability to give out loans has suffered recently, which is a matter of concern. The rise of non-performing loans (NPL) due to defaults by clients has impacted the liquidity of the banks.[6]
The government last year imposed restrictions on savings certificates which increased bank deposits by 10% to solve the liquidity crisis of banks.[6] Moreover, Bangladesh Bank increased the banks’ advance-deposit ratio (ADR) and lowered the cash reserve ratio (CRR) and repurchase agreement rate (repo rate) to facilitate the commercial banks’ ability to generate funds for the stimulus packages.[7]
The above-mentioned actions will help commercial banks ensure liquidity and finance loans. However, if the trend of rising default is also seen in the current scenario, non-performing loans will increase again. This rise will once more impact the banks’ liquidity. Once the pandemic is over, banks will then be forced to raise their interest rates for lending, which will hamper private investments.
Earlier, the World Bank predicted Bangladesh’s GDP growth to fall and be in the range of 1.2% to 2.9% for the next year.[8] The combination of the two possibilities – the government focusing on debt payments and banks raising interest rates arising from paying off loans/stimulus packages will further hamper future growth prospects.
Post-pandemic, the country will need to face the trade-off between paying off debt and interest and raising economic growth. To avoid choosing one over the other, the government will need to focus on raising revenue and reducing expenditure for its next fiscal year’s budget.
There have been criticisms of the Bangladeshi government’s revenue collection capacity. Bangladesh has one of the lowest tax-to-GDP ratios among its South Asian peers.[9] According to data from the Bangladesh Economic Review 2019, the country’s tax-to-GDP ratio for FY 2018-19 stands at 13.4%.
The agency responsible for the collection of a major amount of revenue, the National Board of Revenue (NBR), has often failed to meet its tax collection target in recent years. Moreover, capital flight has also increased.[10] As a result, the government is missing out on a significant amount of revenue.
The action for the government thus will be to increase revenue collection efforts. An increased revenue collection effort will help the government to pay off the costs incurred due to the stimulus package releases. This also means that the government will not need to sacrifice development projects for the future.
Due to the decrease in economic activity, and consequently less income reporting by individuals and corporations, the NBR will need to lower revenue targets for the next fiscal year. That being said, agencies should nevertheless manage to meet even those lower targets. Meeting those lower targets can help in revenue-raising efforts.
The government’s expenditure has increased over the years. This rise in expenditure has been paid for with increased borrowing. As mentioned before, increased borrowing has been sourced from commercial banks which reduces the latter’s capacity to lend to private investors. To create a proper system for paying off the stimulus package, government expenditures must be reduced.
Having said that, there are certain sectors where the government will need to increase expenditures once the crisis is over – the health sector being the first and foremost.
As the current crisis has shown, Bangladesh’s healthcare system is poorly equipped. The current budget allocation for healthcare stands at only 5.63% which is much lower than the 15% benchmark recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO).[11]
There will also be other areas where expenditures will need to be increased. This includes assistance to the unemployed and the vulnerable. Therefore, the government, while reducing expenditures overall, will still need to increase spending in certain areas in the next fiscal year.
Paying off stimulus packages in the future will require the government of Bangladesh to use a combination of increasing revenue collections and cutting down expenses. However, cutting expenditures should not come at the expense of the healthcare system and supporting vulnerable populations.
Recently, the government has received a large number of funds from foreign agencies. The funds include a £21 million fund by the UK government and US$100 million financings from the World Bank.[12][13]
The government is also requesting a US$600 million fund from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and US$250 million funds from the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB).[14][15]
All of these funds are targeted at improving the healthcare sector’s response to COVID-19 and supporting various groups. Thus, the government should properly allocate these funds to reduce spending without needing to sacrifice support for critical sectors. Moreover, raising revenue through an effective collection system will reduce both the budget deficit and the need for external financing.
Farhan Uddin, Trainee Consultant at LightCastle Partners, has prepared the write-up. For further clarifications, contact here: [email protected].
The LightCastle team has been analyzing the macro and industry level picture and possible impacts wrought about by the Covid-19 crisis. Over the following days, we’ll be covering the major sectors shedding light on the possible short and long term ramifications of the global pandemic. Read all the articles in the series.
Our experts can help you solve your unique challenges
Stay up-to-date with our Thought Leadership and Insights